WHISK(E)Y DILEMMAS (Vol. 1)

By Brett Calish


AARRRGGGGHHHHH!!!!!!


AARRRGGGGHHHHH!!!!!!

(Quoting Charlie Brown as he tries in vain to get a bead on Lucy’s (American) football seems as apt a metaphor as any to describe my “discovery” of whisk(e)y.)

I mean, it used to be so easy! My first single malt, a Cragganmore 12, was simple enough. Grassy, a little fruit, dry. Too thin on the finish. Maybe singles weren’t for me? “This is a Speyside”, I was told.

A couple of Classic Malts later, I found the whisky that suckered me in – Lagavulin 16. Again, though, simple enough. Peat, smoke, sweet, yet bitter. Amazing finish. “This is an Islay”, they said. OK, I thought. I get it.

No I don’t.

See, here’s the deal: Regions of Scotland can no longer be classified. Scottish distilleries are putting out different expressions of their whisky that defy their own taste profiles. American whiskeys are experimenting with different grains. Japanese and other world whiskies are a virtually untapped palate. Independent bottlers offer even more confusion and excitement. And I only have one glass.

First off, don’t believe the regional classifications. Don’t assume that all Speysides are sweet, “islands” are fiery or rugged, or Islays are harsh or medicinal. If I gave you a blind tasting of Bunnahabhain 25 (Islay), Scapa 14 (island), and a Macallan Fine Oak 12 (Speyside), I think that you’d be hard pressed to classify them correctly.

In addition, distillers are adding wine finishes to their portfolios – for better and worse. I never much cared for Glenkinchie. Too light, not enough body. But throw it in an amontillado cask for a little while, and wow, one of the best “Distillers Editions” that I’ve ever tasted! Conversely, I can’t figure out what Edradour even is anymore. The smallest distillery in Scotland, yet at the time of this writing, they have approximately 8 billion different wine finishes, and counting. I’d like to review some, but I’m a simple man, and I get all confused.

Bottom line, though – the distilleries can’t be pigeonholed anymore. You have to taste their products, not just assume their flavor profile.

Secondly, American distillers are really branching-out. We now have four-grain bourbon (Woodford Reserve), wheat whiskey (Bernheim), smooth ryes (Sazerac), incredible small batch bourbons from Beam, and the list goes on. And let’s not forget Oregon and California. Yes, whiskey isn’t just made in Kentucky and Tennessee, anymore. It’s a thirsty country, you know!

The third reason to keep rinsing your glass is Japanese whisky, a class by itself because of its potential. Right now, you can only get a few expressions of Suntory Yamazaki in the US, but you would think that would have to change, wouldn’t you? Yoichi, Hakushu, Sendai, Karuizawa – they’re getting great press. I want to taste them. If you get a chance, pick yourself up a bottle of Yamazaki 18, the best Japanese whisky available in the US. And I haven’t even mentioned Mackmyra (Sweden), Penderyn (Wales), Irish, Australian, etc, etc…

And then there are the independents. Oy! A one-off cask may not be consistent with what the distillery may want, but hey, if it’s yummy enough, it’s going to find itself bottled by one of many independent bottlers on the scene. Don’t shy away from independent bottlings – many are incredible! If you can, try them at a Scotch tasting. Then, if you like it, buy it – remember, unlike distillery bottlings, these independent bottlings will never be repeated.

So, that’s my dilemma. I’ve got a cornucopia of flavors to experience, and I’m only one guy. But I am open to suggestions. In the meantime, I have to go do some, um, research…


Questions or comments are welcome, I can be reached at brett@whiskyguild.com